##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Mohammed Z.M. Almadani
Maslita Abd Aziz
T. Zalizam T. Muda

Abstract

Interpreting brain MRI for tumor diagnosis is time-consuming and varies between raters, and single-slice decisions can be fragile. This paper compares two classification pipelines on the Brain Tumor Classification (MRI) Dataset from Kaggle (glioma, meningioma, pituitary, no-tumor) of T1-contrast-enhanced images. The first is a per-slice CNN. The second is a per-group CRNN-GRU that reads an ordered sequence of ten slices with a bidirectional GRU and inter-slice attention. Because the dataset provides no patient identifiers, the analysis unit is a surrogate slice group, and the splits are group-disjoint by construction; all models are compared at the group-level. The per-slice CNN reached 80.0% slice-level accuracy. Aggregated to the group-level, the same CNN reached 92.68% by majority voting and 95.12% by mean-probability pooling. The CRNN-GRU reached 90.2% in a single pass, and 87.8% with test-time augmentation. No pairwise difference is statistically significant (exact McNemar, all p >= 0.25). The results do not show that sequential modelling and inter-slice attention improve on simple probability aggregation on this dataset, and the simplest configuration was the most accurate. A content-level audit found a small number of images duplicated across partitions, so all figures should be read as upper bounds. These results describe internal performance on one dataset under group-disjoint evaluation with a content-level leakage audit and do not establish clinical generalization.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Almadani, M. Z., Aziz, M. A., & Muda, T. Z. T. (2026). Slice-Group-Level Brain Tumor Classification Using CRNN-GRU. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 15(2), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijobas.v15i2.944
References
[1] R. L. Siegel, T. B. Kratzer, A. N. Giaquinto, H. Sung, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2025,” CA Cancer J. Clin., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 10–45, Jan. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21871.
[2] S. Grochans et al., “Epidemiology of Glioblastoma Multiforme–Literature Review,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 10, p. 2412, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102412.
[3] L. Hirschler et al., “Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1655–1675, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28662.
[4] R. Martínez-Del-Río-Ortega, J. Civit-Masot, F. Luna-Perejón, and M. Domínguez-Morales, “Brain Tumor Detection Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Convolutional Neural Networks,” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 123, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8090123.
[5] M. Essien et al., “Interrater Agreement of BT-RADS for Evaluation of Follow-up MRI in Patients with Treated Primary Brain Tumor,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1308–1315, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8322.
[6] L. Alzubaidi et al., “Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions,” J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 53, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8.
[7] I. D. Mienye, T. G. Swart, G. Obaido, M. Jordan, and P. Ilono, “Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Image Analysis: A Review,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 3, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030195.
[8] F. J. Díaz-Pernas, M. Martínez-Zarzuela, M. Antón-Rodríguez, and D. González-Ortega, “A Deep Learning Approach for Brain Tumor Classification and Segmentation Using a Multiscale Convolutional Neural Network,” Healthcare, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 153, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020153.
[9] B. Babu Vimala, S. Srinivasan, S. K. Mathivanan, Mahalakshmi, P. Jayagopal, and G. T. Dalu, “Detection and classification of brain tumor using hybrid deep learning models,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 23029, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50505-6.
[10] H. Yoon, D.-Y. Kang, and S. Kim, “Enhancement and evaluation for deep learning-based classification of volumetric neuroimaging with 3D-to-2D knowledge distillation,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 29611, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80938-6.
[11] K. Jin, C. Sun, and L. Xia, “Development of a hybrid 2.5D deep learning model for glioma survival prediction using T1-weighted MRI from the CGGA database,” Eur. J. Radiol. Open, vol. 15, p. 100697, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100697.
[12] A. Saboor et al., “DDFC: deep learning approach for deep feature extraction and classification of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging in E-healthcare system,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 6425, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56983-6.
[13] J. Lee et al., “Bidirectional gated recurrent unit network model can generate future visual field with variable number of input elements,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 8, p. e0307498, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307498.
[14] M. Li, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhu, “Medical image analysis using deep learning algorithms,” Front. Public Health, vol. 11, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1273253.
[15] K. Lin, B. Jie, P. Dong, X. Ding, W. Bian, and M. Liu, “Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network for Dynamic Functional MRI Analysis and Brain Disease Identification,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 16, p. 933660, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.933660.
[16] R. P. K. Poudel, P. Lamata, and G. Montana, “Recurrent Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Multi-slice MRI Cardiac Segmentation,” in Reconstruction, Segmentation, and Analysis of Medical Images, vol. 10129, M. A. Zuluaga, K. Bhatia, B. Kainz, M. H. Moghari, and D. F. Pace, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52280-7_8.
[17] I. Rethemiotaki, “Brain tumour detection from magnetic resonance imaging using convolutional neural networks,” Współczesna Onkologia, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 230–241, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2023.135320.
[18] S. Deepak and P. M. Ameer, “Brain tumor classification using deep CNN features via transfer learning,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 111, p. 103345, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103345.
[19] S. Kapoor and A. Narayanan, “Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science,” Patterns, vol. 4, no. 9, p. 100804, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804.
[20] E. Yagis et al., “Effect of data leakage in brain MRI classification using 2D convolutional neural networks,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 22544, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01681-w.
[21] I. E. Tampu, A. Eklund, and N. Haj-Hosseini, “Inflation of test accuracy due to data leakage in deep learning-based classification of OCT images,” Sci. Data, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 580, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01618-6.
[22] Z. N. K. Swati et al., “Brain tumor classification for MR images using transfer learning and fine-tuning,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 75, pp. 34–46, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.05.001.
[23] P. P. Malla, S. Sahu, and A. I. Alutaibi, “Classification of Tumor in Brain MR Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Global Average Pooling,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 679, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030679.
[24] M. M. Ahmed et al., “Brain tumor detection and classification in MRI using hybrid ViT and GRU model with explainable AI in Southern Bangladesh,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 22797, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71893-3.
[25] A. Priya and V. Vasudevan, “Brain tumor classification and detection via hybrid alexnet-gru based on deep learning,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 89, p. 105716, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105716.
[26] S. Bhuvaji, A. Kadam, P. Bhumkar, S. Dedge, and S. Kanchan, “Brain Tumor Classification (MRI),” 2020, Kaggle. https://doi.org/10.34740/KAGGLE/DSV/1183165.
[27] L. Maier-Hein et al., “Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation,” Nat. Methods, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 195–212, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02151-z.
[28] G. Varoquaux and V. Cheplygina, “Machine learning for medical imaging: methodological failures and recommendations for the future,” NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 48, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00592-y.
[29] B. H. M. Van Der Velden, H. J. Kuijf, K. G. A. Gilhuijs, and M. A. Viergever, “Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 79, p. 102470, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102470.
[30] V. Malik and A. J. Singh, “Explainable Mitochondrial Image Segmentation and Morphological Quantification using Deep Learning Based Framework,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 152–161, 2026, https://doi.org/10.35335/ijobas.v14i4.845.
[31] A. C. Yu, B. Mohajer, and J. Eng, “External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Radiologic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review,” Radiol. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. 3, p. e210064, May 2022, https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.210064.
[32] A. S. Tejani et al., “Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update,” Radiol. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, no. 4, p. e240300, Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240300.

Author Biographies

Mohammed Z.M. Almadani, Quality Assurance & Test Automation Department, Vianeos Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Remote QA Engineer Manual & Automationuality, Quality Assurance & Test Automation Department

T. Zalizam T. Muda, School of Multimedia Technology and Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

School of Multimedia Technology and Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia