##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Dewi Maharani

Abstract

The combination of the Multi-Objective Optimization method on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) and the Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) is used by researchers in selecting the best hafidzoh so as to produce effective and efficient research objectives and make it easier for leaders to determine the best hafidzoh. Choosing the best hafidzoh is not an easy matter due to the large number of students and the large number of criteria given. Furthermore, the best students or candidates for hafidzoh are called alternatives, while the things that are assessed are called criteria. Based on the results of interviews and references that the researchers conducted, the criteria for helping the Chairperson of the Dzunnur'ain Simalungun Institute in determining the best hafidzoh were letter makhorijul, tajwid, itqon hifzd, adabul qiroah and Arabic. Meanwhile, the best alternative or candidate for hafidzoh is the total number of students in Lambaga Dzunnur 'ain, which is 30 students. Furthermore, researchers conducted analysis and calculations based on the formula of the MOORA method and the formula of the WASPAS method. The results of the analysis and calculations are that the Moora and WASPAS methods get the same best santri, namely the alternative name Santri 7, while for the second rank the alternatives obtained are santri 16 and santri 25.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Maharani, D. (2021). Combination of MOORA and WASPAS Methods in Selecting the Best Hafidzoh. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 10(2), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijobas.v10i2.53
References
E. Lipschultz et al., “Creation of a pharmacogenomics patient portal complementary to an existing institutional provider-facing clinical decision support system,” JAMIA Open, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab067.
I. P. Okokpujie, U. C. Okonkwo, C. A. Bolu, O. S. Ohunakin, M. G. Agboola, and A. A. Atayero, “Implementation of multi-criteria decision method for selection of suitable material for development of horizontal wind turbine blade for sustainable energy generation,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, p. e03142, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03142.
M. Suginan, Emi Suryani, Sapria, Ulandari Lubis, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Siswa Miskin Menerapkan Metode WASPAS dan MOORA,” Semin. Nas. Sains Teknol. Inf., pp. 719–727, 2018.
L. H. Marcial, D. S. Johnston, M. R. Shapiro, S. R. Jacobs, B. Blumenfeld, and L. Rojas Smith, “A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: Eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation,” JAMIA Open, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 187–196, 2019, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz002.
R. A. Bush, A. Pérez, T. Baum, C. Etland, and C. D. Connelly, “A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care,” JAMIA Open, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 294–303, 2018, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy028.
D. Sobari, Sumanto, and K. Indriani, “Pemilihan Santri Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” pp. 32–41, 2017.
J. M. Baron, R. Huang, D. McEvoy, and A. S. Dighe, “Use of machine learning to predict clinical decision support compliance, reduce alert burden, and evaluate duplicate laboratory test ordering alerts,” JAMIA Open, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab006.
S. Visweswaran et al., “Evaluation of eye tracking for a decision support application,” JAMIA Open, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab059.
R. Amarullah and R. M. Simanjorang, “Planning Decision Support System Using Building Mall AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process),” J. Tek. Inform. C.I.T, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2020, [Online]. Available: www.medikom.iocspublisher.org/index.php/JTI.
A. Mutiara, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Santri Terbaik Tahfidzh Qur ’ an Pada Yayasan Islamic Center Menggunakan Metode VIKOR,” vol. 1, no. 2, 2020.
A. Sahren, “Selecting The Best Cow Seeds Using The Moora Method,” Int. Conf. Soc. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 4509, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020.
N. Sari, “Implementation of the AHP-SAW Method in the Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Tourism Village,” J. Tek. Inform. CIT Medicom, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.medikom.iocspublisher.org/index.php/JTI/article/view/51.
K. Kawamoto et al., “Establishing a multidisciplinary initiative for interoperable electronic health record innovations at an academic medical center,” JAMIA Open, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab041.
I. M. Dwi, P. Asana, I. G. I. Sudipa, K. Ari, and P. Putra, “A Decision Support System on Employee Assessment Using Analytical Network Process ( ANP ) and BARS Methods,” vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
G. S. Mahendra and E. Hartono, “Implementation of AHP-MAUT and AHP-Profile Matching Methods in OJT Student Placement DSS,” J. Tek. Inform. C.I.T Medicom, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2021.
A. Nikas, H. Doukas, and L. Martínez López, “A group decision making tool for assessing climate policy risks against multiple criteria,” Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00588.
L. Pérez-Domínguez, L. A. Rodríguez-Picón, A. Alvarado-Iniesta, D. Luviano Cruz, and Z. Xu, “MOORA under Pythagorean Fuzzy Set for Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” Complexity, vol. 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/2602376.
A. Afrisawati and S. Sahren, “Analisis Perbandingan Menggunakan Metode Moora Dan Waspas Pemilihan Bibit Sapi Potong Terbaik,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknol. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 269–276, 2020, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v6i3.827.
C. Lukita, C. Nas, and W. Ilham, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode MOORA dan Metode WASPAS Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Utama Peningkatan Kualitas Mata Pelajaran,” J. Nas. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 130–137, 2020, doi: 10.25077/teknosi.v5i3.2019.130-137.
M. Handayani and N. Marpaung, “Implementasi Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (Waspas) Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Laboratorium,” Semin. Nas. R. 2018 ISSN 2622-9986 STMIK R. R. ISSN 2622-6510 , vol. 9986, no. September, pp. 253 – 258, 2018.
K. A. Chandra and S. Hansun, “Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Laptop Dengan Metode Waspas,” J. Ecotipe (Electronic, Control. Telecommun. Information, Power Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2019, doi: 10.33019/ecotipe.v6i2.1019.
S. Bid and G. Siddique, “Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 6, p. e01956, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956.
R. N. R. Elly, “THE COMPARISON OF WASPAS AND VIKOR METHODS IN ASSESSMENT OF LECTURER PERFORMANCE,” Proceeding Int. Conf. ISSN 2723-4509 Soc. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 4509, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020.
F. E. Ayo, J. B. Awotunde, R. O. Ogundokun, S. O. Folorunso, and A. O. Adekunle, “A decision support system for multi-target disease diagnosis: A bioinformatics approach,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 3, p. e03657, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03657.
C. E. B. Sousa, C. M. S. Medeiros, R. F. Pereira, A. A. Neto, and M. A. V. Neto, “A decision support system for fault detection and definition of the quality of wet blue goat skins,” Heliyon, vol. 7, p. e08021, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08021.